Have spent lots of time on a family member's Fz-09. Its a lot of bike. Fuel mapping is now updated through the dealer at no charge and bike runs really well. Has a ton of power. Wheelies in 1st-3rd and that triple sounds badass with an aftermarket can. The main issue with that bike is that is has way more motor than suspension in stock form. Andreani cartridges and an Ohlins shock will set you back about $1,500 but then you have an amazing do-everything bike. Basically a mini KTM 1290 Super Duke.Would any Scrambler owner on here rather have one of these? Japanese reliabilty etc. etc.
Reliability should be decent on the Scrambler as that motor is well known to get high mileage with nothing but required maintenance but that is alao where the Yamaha is less fussy.Interesting, fellows. I was expecting a bit of abuse, to be honest. I was going to buy a Scrambler, the Full Throttle variant, but I think the FZ/MT-09 suits me more. There's more room on it, it will be more reliable (I don't trust Ducati to keep a close eye on the Thais), and I like the look of it almost as much as the Scrambler. Having said that, I find the Scrambler a bit dinky. I will be making my purchase in Chiang Mai, northern Thailand as I will be based in Chiang Rai for seven or eight months a year with the rest of the time being spent in Portugal where the Buell Ulysses (very underrated bike. If you want torque ...) will have to be sold. I'll still have my K-King there, though.
In a way, I feel I'm sort of bottling out. The Scrambler may well turn out to be a super reliable bike. It's just that out of my five Japanese bikes (in my whole life. I keep them a long time), none have given me any trouble at all. My four non-Japanese bikes have all given me trouble: MZ (I hear you laughing), BMW, KTM and Buell.
Good luck with the Scramblers, lads and ladettes. And ride safe.
The fueling issue has been addressed (long ago) and is available to all owners free of charge.Had a MT-09 and it spent 7 weeks out of the 12 weeks I owned at the Dealers trying to get it to run properly. The fuelling was so bad in my opinion it was dangerous to ride. In the end I rejected under the Sale of goods act and I got my money back.
I gather lots of people are complaining about very bad fueling.
I can't imagine it hitting you harder than the Scrambler on a warm (not even hot day) in slow traffic. I got a mild burn on my left leg recently when I was forced to ride in shorts (in the night, after rain, cool air). And no, the leg didn't touch engine/frame. It really radiates insane amounts of heat when not going faster than around 50km/h.when the fan of MT hits you, it hits you hard... even when you are actually moving
that was another reason I switched to air cooled... but this is purely personal experience![]()
Luckily, there was a readily available reflash for that...I think Yamaha released one available at dealers for free.Had a MT-09 and it spent 7 weeks out of the 12 weeks I owned at the Dealers trying to get it to run properly. The fuelling was so bad in my opinion it was dangerous to ride. In the end I rejected under the Sale of goods act and I got my money back.
I gather lots of people are complaining about very bad fueling.
Yea that's something I'll never understand. How can big companies like Yamaha make such obvious mistakes?It boggles my mind that it could be so bad but wasn't realized until after it was released and tons of people complained.
Singapore is definitely hot, but I don't ride with shorts anyway >I can't imagine it hitting you harder than the Scrambler on a warm (not even hot day) in slow traffic. I got a mild burn on my left leg recently when I was forced to ride in shorts (in the night, after rain, cool air). And no, the leg didn't touch engine/frame. It really radiates insane amounts of heat when not going faster than around 50km/h.
Every watercooled engine I've ridding so far was way way better in terms of heat.